A job applicant or an employee cannot be discriminated
against because of his/her age. Both federal and state
laws prohibit age- related discriminatory practices
in regard to hiring, employment, wages, promotion,
compensation, employee benefits, health care coverage,
etc. The laws are designed to promote the employment
of older persons based on their abilities and qualifications,
irrespective of age. The federal Law—the
Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA— protects
employees over 40 from being discriminated against
at the work place due to their age.
Actions prohibited by federal and
state law:
|
|
Denial of a particular
job to a qualified applicant on the basis of age
|
|
|
Firing employees because of
old age and recruiting younger people in their
place |
|
|
Denial of promotions, transfers,
or assignments because of age |
|
|
Forcing older employees to take
early retirement |
 |
Making age-related remarks |
 |
Penalizing older employees with
reduced privileges, employment opportunities,
or compensation |
 |
It is unlawful to include age
preferences, limitations, or specifications in
job notices or advertisements. |
The Age Discrimination in Employment
Act (ADEA)
 |
The ADEA protects
individuals who are 40 years of age or older from
employment discrimination based on age. The ADEA's
protections apply to both employees and job applicants.
|
 |
It covers public as well as
private sector employees, companies employing
at least 20 people, and unions and employment
agencies. The ADEA does not apply to elected officials
or independent contractors. |
 |
It is unlawful to discriminate
against a person because of his/her age with respect
to any term, condition, or privilege of employment,
including, but not limited to, hiring, firing,
promotion, layoff, compensation, benefits, job
assignments, and training. |
 |
It is unlawful to retaliate
against the employee for opposing employment practices
that discriminate based on age, or for
filing an age discrimination charge, or for testifying
or participating in any way in an investigation,
proceeding or litigation under the ADEA. |
 |
The law is enforced by the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). It has
the authority under the ADEA both to investigate
complaints and to file lawsuits. However, individuals
may file lawsuits in either state or federal court
alleging violations of ADEA. |
 |
It is generally unlawful for
apprenticeship programs, including joint labor-management
apprenticeship programs, to discriminate on the
basis of an individual's age. Age limitations
in apprenticeship programs are valid only if they
fall within certain specific exceptions under
the ADEA or if the EEOC grants a specific exemption. |
 |
The ADEA does not specifically
prohibit an employer from asking an applicant's
age or date of birth. However, because such inquiries
may deter older workers from applying for employment
or may otherwise indicate possible intent to discriminate
based on age, requests for age information (or
such related questions as “When did you
graduate from high school?”) will be closely
scrutinized to make sure that the inquiry was
made for a lawful purpose, rather than for a purpose
prohibited by the ADEA. |
ADEA Exceptions
 |
If the employee
has been in a bona fide executive position or
in a high policy-making position for the past
two years and is entitled to an annual pension
of at least $44,000 a year, the employee can be
required to retire at the age of 65. |
 |
If age is a bona fide occupational
qualification (BFOQ) of the employee's job, the
employment may be terminated when the age becomes
a relevant factor. The BFOQ exception is limited
to jobs where the employer can legitimize a cutoff
age for reasons that are reasonably necessary
for the normal operation of the enterprise. For
example: safety personnel (firefighters, police
officers), tenured university faculty, and certain
federal employees having to do with law enforcement
and air traffic control. |
 |
Or if the employee's job is
terminated because of the operation of a bona
fide security system, retirement plan, or apprentice
system. |
The employee can recover the following
as damages:
 |
Job reinstatement,
in the event of job termination because of age
|
 |
Wage adjustments |
 |
Back pay or double back pay
|
 |
Future pay |
 |
Promotions |
 |
Recovery of legal fees |
 |
Witness fees |
 |
Filing costs |
 |
Compensatory damages up to $300,000. |
 |
In cases where the employer
acted with reckless disregard for the rights of
the employee, the employer must pay the employee
liquidated damages. For example, if the employer
owes the employee $30,000 in back pay, liquidated
damages would equal an additional $30,000. The
courts also award attorney's fees to successful
plaintiffs. |
In the following situations, employers
have certain rights:
 |
The employer can
fire or terminate the employment of older workers
for documented, inadequate job performance or
other good cause |
 |
When the employee voluntarily
agrees to early retirement as a result of being
offered additional benefits, such as a larger
pension, extended health insurance, or a substantial
severance package |
 |
The employer may force the employee
to retire, if the employee is 65 or older, has
worked as an executive for the past two years,
and is entitled to an annual pension of at least
$44,000 a year |
 |
If both the older employees
and younger employees are laid off and treated
on the same terms |
 |
The employer may refuse to hire
older applicants when successful job performance
absolutely requires that a younger person be hired
for the job |
 |
Employers have the right to
take adverse decisions as part of good-faith business
decisions and which do not have any discriminatory
intentions. |
Older Workers Benefit Protection
Act of 1990 (OWBPA)
The OWBPA amended the ADEA to specifically prohibit
employers from denying benefits to older employees.
An employer may reduce benefits based on age only
if the cost of providing the reduced benefits to older
workers is the same as the cost of providing benefits
to younger workers.
At an employer's request, an individual may agree
to waive his/her rights or claims under the ADEA.
However, the ADEA, as amended by OWBPA, sets out specific
standards that must be met in order for a waiver to
be considered to be valid.
Among other requirements, a valid
ADEA waiver:
 |
Must be in writing,
be understandable, and voluntarily agreed to by
the employee |
 |
Must specifically refer to ADEA
rights or claims |
 |
May not waive rights or claims
that may arise in the future |
 |
Must be in exchange for valuable
consideration |
 |
Must advise the individual in
writing to consult an attorney before signing
the waiver |
 |
Must provide the individual
at least 21 days to consider the agreement before
it is effective, and at least 7 days to revoke
the agreement after signing it. |
 |
In addition, if an employer
requests an ADEA waiver in connection with an
exit incentive program or other employment termination
program, the minimum requirements for a valid
waiver are more extensive. When the employer requires
waivers in connection with mass termination programs
and large scale voluntary retirement programs,
all individual must be given written notification
and the facts on: the class, unit or group of
individuals covered by the program; any eligibility
factors for the program; time limits applicable
to the program; the job titles and ages of all
individuals selected for the program; and the
ages of all individuals not eligible for the program.
All the individuals in the program must be given
at least 45 days to consider the agreement. |
Many states have enacted tougher laws protecting
workers by reducing the number of employees an employer
must have to be subject to the law or by reducing
the cutoff age for inclusion into a protected class.
Employers should check their respective state laws
to see what protection is available to employees working
for small employers. Some state agencies process discrimination
cases more quickly than the EEOC and may also provide
greater damages and remedies. It is best to consult
a qualified attorney before pursuing an age discrimination
case.
|
|